Negotiating Proper Diligence Periods: A Game Changer for Buyers and Sellers

Josh Perez • November 15, 2024

As a real estate professional, I’ve seen my fair share of buyers struggling to navigate the pressures of making offers, especially in competitive markets. One recurring challenge is the limited diligence period in conditional offers—often shaped by competing bids or a seller’s urgency. Let me share some thoughts on why negotiating the right diligence period matters and how working collaboratively can make all the difference.

" You just got to ask the right questions, and then you have to be working with people that are willing to do that."

Why the Diligence Period Matters

The diligence period is critical because it gives buyers the time they need to evaluate the property thoroughly, arrange for financing, and ensure everything aligns with their goals. Yet, I often see buyers pushed into accepting two-week conditional periods—or worse—none at all. It’s a recipe for gut decisions that leave everyone feeling uneasy.

But here’s the thing: the “two-week rule” isn’t set in stone. When I work with clients, I focus on understanding why the timeline matters to the seller. Are they worried about the deal falling apart? Do they have concerns about another buyer coming through? Once you unpack the reasons behind the deadline, you can negotiate a more realistic timeframe that benefits both parties.


Avoiding the Pressure of Snap Decisions

When I collaborate with trusted agents or advisors, it’s a completely different experience. Instead of rushing to fit into an arbitrary timeline, we strategize to ensure that both parties feel confident about the deal. For example, one of my colleagues mentioned how seamless it feels when we work together. They’re not constantly calling me, panicked about whether we’ll meet some unrealistic deadline. Instead, we align on expectations upfront, ensuring buyers aren’t forced into gut decisions.


Asking the Right Questions

A key part of navigating these challenges is asking the right questions.


If a seller insists on a two-week conditional period, I dig deeper:


  • Why is the timeline so critical?
  • What assurance do they need to feel confident in the deal?
  • What can we provide upfront to bridge the gap?


In many cases, it’s not about the timeline itself but about the seller’s fear of wasting time on a deal that might collapse. Addressing these concerns upfront—whether by providing financial assurances, clear communication, or creative solutions—often leads to better outcomes.


Strategizing for Success

Take the example of a 30-unit property we recently worked on. The buyer had specific needs, and the seller had certain expectations. By sitting down and strategizing offline, we pinpointed what was critical to both sides and crafted an approach that worked. We didn’t rush to meet arbitrary deadlines; instead, we focused on creating comfort and trust between all parties.


The Bottom Line

Whether you’re a buyer, seller, or agent, the diligence period isn’t just a box to check—it’s an opportunity to ensure the deal works for everyone. By asking the right questions, building strong relationships, and approaching negotiations thoughtfully, we can create an environment where no one feels pressured to make snap decisions.

If you’re navigating the complexities of conditional offers and want a team that prioritizes due diligence and clear communication, let’s connect. Together, we’ll strategize a plan that ensures confidence every step of the way.


Have questions? Let's talk! Book a call with me.

BOOK A CALL
Josh Perez
GET STARTED
By Josh Perez June 11, 2025
One of the benefits of working with an independent mortgage professional is having lots of great financing options! Rather than dealing with a single lender with one set of products, independent mortgage professionals work with multiple lenders who offer a wide selection of mortgage financing options that provide more choice. Increased choice in mortgage products is beneficial when your situation isn’t “normal,” or you don’t quite fit the profile of a standard buyer. Purchasing a new construction home through an assignment contract would be a great example of this. Purchasing a new construction home through an assignment contract can be tricky as not every lender wants the added perceived risk of dealing with this type of transaction. Most of these lenders won’t come out and say it; instead, they add a significant list of qualifying conditions to make the process harder. The good news is, there are lenders available exclusively through the broker channel that have favourable policies for assignment purchases. Here are some of the highlights: All standard purchase qualifications apply, including applicable income verification, established credit, and required downpayment Assignments can be at the original purchase price or current market value Minimum 620 beacon score with no previous bankruptcies or consumer proposals The full downpayment must come from the purchaser and not include any incentives from the seller. As far as documentation goes, the lender will want to see the original purchase agreement signed by all parties, the MLS listing, the assignment agreement signed by the builder, the original purchaser, and the new buyer. The lender will also want to see the side agreement between the original purchaser and the new buyer, including the amended purchase price. The lender will want to substantiate the value through a full appraisal. Now, as every situation is different, this list of conditions is in no way exhaustive but meant to show that assigning a new construction purchase contract is doable while highlighting some of the terms necessary to secure financing. If you’re looking to purchase new construction through an assignment contract, or if you’d like to discuss purchasing a home through traditional means, please connect anytime! It would be a pleasure to outline the mortgage products on the market that won’t limit your financing options!
By Josh Perez June 4, 2025
Bank of Canada holds policy rate at 2¾%. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Relations Ottawa, Ontario June 4, 2025 The Bank of Canada today maintained its target for the overnight rate at 2.75%, with the Bank Rate at 3% and the deposit rate at 2.70%. Since the April Monetary Policy Report, the US administration has continued to increase and decrease various tariffs. China and the United States have stepped back from extremely high tariffs and bilateral trade negotiations have begun with a number of countries. However, the outcomes of these negotiations are highly uncertain, tariff rates are well above their levels at the beginning of 2025, and new trade actions are still being threatened. Uncertainty remains high. While the global economy has shown resilience in recent months, this partly reflects a temporary surge in activity to get ahead of tariffs. In the United States, domestic demand remained relatively strong but higher imports pulled down first-quarter GDP. US inflation has ticked down but remains above 2%, with the price effects of tariffs still to come. In Europe, economic growth has been supported by exports, while defence spending is set to increase. China’s economy has slowed as the effects of past fiscal support fade. More recently, high tariffs have begun to curtail Chinese exports to the US. Since the financial market turmoil in April, risk assets have largely recovered and volatility has diminished, although markets remain sensitive to US policy announcements. Oil prices have fluctuated but remain close to their levels at the time of the April MPR. In Canada, economic growth in the first quarter came in at 2.2%, slightly stronger than the Bank had forecast, while the composition of GDP growth was largely as expected. The pull-forward of exports to the United States and inventory accumulation boosted activity, with final domestic demand roughly flat. Strong spending on machinery and equipment held up growth in business investment by more than expected. Consumption slowed from its very strong fourth-quarter pace, but continued to grow despite a large drop in consumer confidence. Housing activity was down, driven by a sharp contraction in resales. Government spending also declined. The labour market has weakened, particularly in trade-intensive sectors, and unemployment has risen to 6.9%. The economy is expected to be considerably weaker in the second quarter, with the strength in exports and inventories reversing and final domestic demand remaining subdued. CPI inflation eased to 1.7% in April, as the elimination of the federal consumer carbon tax reduced inflation by 0.6 percentage points. Excluding taxes, inflation rose 2.3% in April, slightly stronger than the Bank had expected. The Bank’s preferred measures of core inflation, as well as other measures of underlying inflation, moved up. Recent surveys indicate that households continue to expect that tariffs will raise prices and many businesses say they intend to pass on the costs of higher tariffs. The Bank will be watching all these indicators closely to gauge how inflationary pressures are evolving. With uncertainty about US tariffs still high, the Canadian economy softer but not sharply weaker, and some unexpected firmness in recent inflation data, Governing Council decided to hold the policy rate as we gain more information on US trade policy and its impacts. We will continue to assess the timing and strength of both the downward pressures on inflation from a weaker economy and the upward pressures on inflation from higher costs. Governing Council is proceeding carefully, with particular attention to the risks and uncertainties facing the Canadian economy. These include: the extent to which higher US tariffs reduce demand for Canadian exports; how much this spills over into business investment, employment and household spending; how much and how quickly cost increases are passed on to consumer prices; and how inflation expectations evolve. We are focused on ensuring that Canadians continue to have confidence in price stability through this period of global upheaval. We will support economic growth while ensuring inflation remains well controlled. Information note The next scheduled date for announcing the overnight rate target is July 30, 2025. The Bank will publish its next MPR at the same time.